Understanding the KiddieTax, Part 2

Another common plan prior to January 1^st, 2000 was to have a partnership whereby the child (or a trust of which the child was a beneficiary) would be a partner and have the partnership receive income from a related entity.  For example, the partnership could provide consulting services to a corporation owned by the parents.  The income received by the partnership could then be allocated to the partners, including the minor child, thus providing for simple yet effective income splitting.

Now both of these income splitting plans are subject to the “Kiddie Tax” to the extent that the income is received by a minor child.  As with most tax rules, many people do not know or understand these rules so it is best to educate yourself (such as you are in reading this blog) and plan with professionals, such us Kustom Design.

One of the typical types of income that is not split income and therefore not subject to the “kiddie tax” is capital gains.  Many plans were set up that involved related corporations that were structured to realize capital gains income.  These plans mainly involved having shares of the corporation being sold to a related corporation and resulting in a capital gain that is taxable in the child’s hands.  Prior to the 2011 Federal Budget, such a plan was often used to the extent that the accountant and/or tax lawyer and their client believed that the general anti-avoidance rule (“GAAR”) would not apply.  The Canada Revenue Agency(CRA), however, was not amused and would often times apply the GAAR to such a plan (with many cases still in the system).  New legislation was then introduced through the 2011 Federal Budget.

We’ll continue our discussion on this new legislation as well as how the Kiddie Tax applies to partnerships and trusts next week.